The two products at a glance

ProductWho it fitsWho should skip itPublished entry priceFree plan
Buddy PunchHourly employers evaluating employee clock-in, attendance, scheduling, and payroll handoffs.Your core use case is detailed client billing, project profitability, or knowledge-work timers.$19/month + $4.99 per user, billed annuallyStarter plan$5.99 per user billed monthly; basic geofencing from the Pro planVendor pricing page, checked Oct 27, 2026 ↗No
ClockifyTeams comparing flexible project and employee time tracking across varied work types.The buying case centers on a specialized field-service payroll clock with deep job-site controls.$3.99 per seat/month, billed annuallyBasic plan$4.99 billed monthly; GPS from the Pro planVendor pricing page, checked Oct 27, 2026 ↗Yes, up to 5 users

Prices are the entry list prices each vendor publishes on its own US pricing page, read on Oct 27, 2026. They exclude taxes, payment processing unless stated, hardware, add-ons and negotiated discounts; a promotion appears only in the notes, labeled as one. Prices change. No vendor paid for a place or a price in this table.

The split here is between a time clock and a time tracker. Buddy Punch is positioned for hourly employers evaluating employee clock-in, attendance, scheduling and payroll handoffs. Clockify is positioned for flexible project and employee time across varied work types. If your people punch in for shifts, the first description is your business. If they log hours against work, the second is.

Verdict: Buddy Punch for shift-based teams, unless project time matters as much as pay

For a restaurant group, a clinic, a retailer or any employer where hourly staff work scheduled shifts, Buddy Punch is our pick. Its positioning covers the chain an hourly employer worries about: who clocked in, who was late or absent, how that compares with the schedule, and what goes to payroll.

Clockify takes the win once a meaningful part of the team also records project time, whether for clients, internal costing or grants. That mixed team is the reader our overall ranking is written for, which is why Clockify places first there and Buddy Punch fifth.

Where Buddy Punch wins

Attendance and schedules. An hourly employer needs to compare punches with shifts, handle missed punches and get approved hours to payroll before the cutoff. Buddy Punch is positioned around exactly that sequence. Check in the trial how a missed punch is corrected, who approves it, and whether the correction stays visible after payroll runs.

Payroll focus. The Fair Labor Standards Act sets the federal minimum-wage and overtime framework, and DOL guidance lists the hours and wage records covered employers keep. A clock built for hourly payroll handoffs aims at that need. It does not determine whether your overtime or classification is right; your payroll owner and advisers do.

Where Clockify wins

Mixed work. When an office manager logs project time, a technician logs shift hours and a consultant logs client work, a flexible tracker keeps them in one place. Clockify is positioned for that range.

Reporting across purposes. If the same hours feed payroll, project costs and client reports, one workspace avoids reconciling two systems. Confirm in the trial that hourly staff see a short entry flow and that the payroll export stays readable once project fields are added.

The counter-risk is the hourly side. In our view, a tracker positioned for breadth may leave more of the clock-in setup to you, so give one shift supervisor the trial for a week and ask whether late arrivals and missed punches were as easy to catch as they are today.

A note on biometric clock-in

If any finalist offers face or fingerprint punches and you have workers in Illinois, read the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act before turning it on. It sets requirements for collecting, retaining, disclosing and destroying biometric identifiers. Whether it applies, and what consent and retention steps you need, is for the employer to determine with counsel.

The deciding test

Count last month's hours by how they were recorded: punches against a schedule, or entries against work. If punches dominate and your pain is attendance and payroll cutoffs, choose Buddy Punch. If entries against work are a large share, or growing, choose Clockify, and set up hourly roles with only the fields they need.

Traceable evidence

Sources for this decision

5 sources
  1. vendorBuddy Punch official product siteBuddy Punch · checked Aug 5, 2026 · supports: Vendor-published product scope used to verify capabilities relevant to this buyer context: Hourly employers evaluating employee clock-in, attendance, scheduling, and payroll handoffs.. It does not prove the guide's fit verdict, configured performance, current pricing or compliance.
    Open source ↗
  2. vendorClockify official product siteClockify · checked Aug 5, 2026 · supports: Vendor-published product scope used to verify capabilities relevant to this buyer context: Teams comparing flexible project and employee time tracking across varied work types.. It does not prove the guide's fit verdict, configured performance, current pricing or compliance.
    Open source ↗
  3. regulatorWages and the Fair Labor Standards ActU.S. Department of Labor · checked Aug 5, 2026 · supports: Federal FLSA coverage, minimum-wage and overtime framework; it does not resolve state rules, exemptions or the worker's actual classification and hours.
    Open source ↗
  4. regulatorFLSA Recordkeeping and ReportingU.S. Department of Labor · checked Aug 5, 2026 · supports: Federal records that covered employers must preserve under the FLSA and their retention context; it does not prove a timekeeping or payroll configuration is accurate.
    Open source ↗
  5. officialBiometric Information Privacy ActIllinois General Assembly · checked Aug 5, 2026 · supports: Illinois statutory requirements for collection, disclosure, retention and destruction of biometric identifiers and information; it does not decide applicability or current legal interpretation for a specific workflow.
    Open source ↗